Search for: "MERCK "
Results 1181 - 1200
of 3,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 9:09 am
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/8110510.htmlThis patent from Merck Patent GmbH teaches techniques to lower the fabrication temperature of semiconductor nanowires to below 400 C. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 3:49 pm
Stock down 10%, then recoups all the losses by midday, then down 15% as Vytorin, an anti-cholesterol agent jointly sold by Merck & Co. and Schering-Plough Corp., failed to show it was effective in stopping progression of a cardiac condition known as aortic stenosis, a partial blockage of the heart's aortic valve, Norwegian researchers said Monday.Whew . . . what a roller coaster . . .But there's more:There were numerically more cancer deaths in the group of patients… [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:17 pm
The Supreme Court heard argument today in the securities class action case, Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2005, 10:56 am
Recently Merck released some findings from a study indicating that a vaccine they have been working on had great results in preventing women from contracting HPV. [read post]
18 May 2016, 7:49 am
Kevin Noonan: Merck v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 10:21 pm
Integra Lifesciences sued Merck, Scripps, and researcher Dr. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:27 am
While the Supreme Court may have expanded the reach of the Hatch-Waxman “safe harbor,” the Medtronic and Merck cases only involved pre-marketing FDA approval activity. [read post]
24 Oct 2005, 5:56 pm
Recently Merck released some findings from a study indicating that a vaccine they have been working on had great results in preventing women from contracting HPV. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 1:15 am
The settlement tops the $58 million paid by Merck over Vioxx marketing as the largest paid by a drug company in a state consumer protection case. [read post]
13 Feb 2006, 5:24 pm
The drug poses greater health risks than similar painkillers, like Pfizer's Celebrex and Merck & Co.'s withdrawn Vioxx. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 7:48 pm
Army study about the smoke from white phosphorus burning in the air which seems to provide some critical information such that should have caught the attention some time later of the medicinal chemists and/or pharmacologists at Merck involved in work done before Fosamax was put on market in 1995. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 12:09 pm
The jury decided in favor of the plaintiff, citing that Merck failed to adequately warn the patient of the risks involved with the product. [read post]
24 May 2005, 4:35 pm
This quote pretty much says it all about Vioxx Cases:A federal judge told dozens of lawyers crowded into a courtroom here Monday that there could ultimately be up to 100,000 cases filed against Merck & Co. over its now withdrawn pain reliever Vioxx, and that he could hear a case as early as the fall. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:55 am
Forest Laboratories, Inc. and Merck & Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 9:55 pm
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2006, 9:17 pm
Fosamax ®, made by Merck, has been prescribed to help reverse bone loss associated with osteoporosis. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:37 pm
Was it really the intention of the Supreme Court to strip away by a side wind protection for future small molecule innovations of the stature of adrenalin (US 730,176; Parke-Davis v Mulford, 189 F. 95, 103 (1911)), digitalis (US 1,898,199), vitamin B12 (US 2,563,794; Merck v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 9:12 pm
Paul Jahn of Morrison & Foerster LLP; William Krovatin of Merck & Co., Inc.; and Richard Rainey of Covington & Burling LLP will explore the significant ramifications of the recent U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:15 am
., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Corning Incorporated, and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. filed amicus briefs. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:59 pm
Noonan -- The Federal Circuit has taken the occasion, in appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board as well as district courts, to remand judgments whenever the Court believes that the record below is devoid of sufficient detail to properly assess the correctness of the decisions made below (see "Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
