Search for: "Majors v. Good"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 17,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2023, 7:12 am
” Making things even more confusing, the Sponsor Memo appended to the bill states that the law “[v]oids current non-compete agreements and prohibits employers from seeking such agreement. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:47 pm
The Supreme Court's 2019 ruling in Timbs v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
A major theme of the book is that almost literally everyone has “misunderstood” or “distorted” Madison’s arguments and conflated his very careful and nuanced theory of interposition with more radical and “dangerous” theories of nullification. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:09 am
Ltd v Babco Forwarding & Shipping (UK) Ltd. [1978] AC 141 (“Buchanan”), the House of Lords decided by a 3:2 majority that the broad interpretation should be adopted. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 10:52 am
V. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Grant Steen, and Arturo Casadevall, “Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications,” 109 Proc. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 7:51 am
It begins: Last week’s voting rights decision in Allen v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
In particular, the concerns that appear to be prominent on FDA’s radar include: “[T]he potential to amplify errors and pre-existing biases in data sources” Concerns about the “generalizability and ethical considerations” of using AI/ML outside of the testing environment The limited explainability and transparency of many AI/ML models Data privacy and security considerations Issues with reproducibility and replicability Generally, the paper highlights the importance of… [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 2:27 am
Consider the case of Bare v AL. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 2:20 am
“Not only is D&I good for business, it is who we are as a V Team and how we show up in the communities where we do business. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 2:20 am
“Not only is D&I good for business, it is who we are as a V Team and how we show up in the communities where we do business. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:14 pm
On Saturday, I offered some faint praise for Chief Justice Roberts's majority opinion in Allen v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 7:22 pm
Last month, in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm
This approach is consistent with existing case law.Rose mentioned that the recent US Supreme Court decision Amgen v Sanofi (No. 21-757) was also a good decision. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:47 pm
In the majority of circumstances, employers in Tennessee can terminate at-will employees for good reasons, bad reasons, or no reasons at all, and face no liability for retaliatory discharge. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
AN INTRODUCTION TO E. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
As in other major intellectual property cases this term – Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 6:30 pm
See Rogers v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:22 am
[Alice Corp. v. [read post]
