Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 1181 - 1200 of 5,978
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2021, 11:04 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Ginsburg (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of International and Comparative Trademark Law (Cambridge University Press 2020)Michal Bohaczewski, Special Protection of Trade Marks with a Reputation under European Union Law, (Kluwer 2020) IPKat book review hereThe winner is: Irene Calboli and Jane C. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
John Gruber of Daring Fireball talks about the different USB-C chargers sold by Apple that may look the same but do not work the same. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 1:38 pm by Thomas Key
The expungement proceeding requires that the movant show that the mark was never in use for some or all of the goods or services claimed; under that ground, the mark may be subject to an expungement proceeding any time after three years after registration. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 6:38 am by Kevin Kaufman
(c) The sales taxes in Hawaii, New Mexico, and South Dakota have broad bases that include many business-to-business services. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 4:07 am
You may also follow the TTABlog on Twitter: @TTABlog.Section 2(a) - False Association:Precedential No. 4: TTAB Affirms 2(a) False Association and 2(c) Consent Refusals of TRUMP-IT Logo for Utility KnivesSection 2(b) - Simulation of Flag:Precedential No. 18: TTAB Upholds 2(b) Refusal of "Civil Rights Trail" Logo Containing Simulation of U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:29 pm by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
CSIS Expert Tom Karako, director of the Missile Defense Project, will join MG Sean Gainey, director of the C-UAS Office, and Nicole M. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 5:35 am by markshermanlaw
Disorderly Conduct is a class C misdemeanor in Connecticut, punishable by up to 3 months in jail, up to a $500 fine and up to 1 year of probation. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm by James Romoser
He was never content with the way things were if he thought there was a better way,” Cannon told C-SPAN in 1995. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:20 am by Nedim Malovic
It therefore concluded that the shape of the mark was the result from the nature of the goods themselves and the shape of goods was also necessary to obtain a technical result.Crocs appealed the cancellation decision to the Swedish Patent and Market Court of Appeal.Cancellation on the basis of ‘a shape of mark which is the result from the nature of the goods themselves and/or necessary to obtain a technical result’According to settled case… [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 2:15 am by Nedim Malovic
Accordingly, a low degree of similarity between those goods or services may be offset by a high degree of similarity between the marks, and vice versa (C-39/97, Canon).In light of all the considerations above and, in particular, the average inherent distinctiveness of the earlier mark, the General Court concluded that there was a likelihood of confusion between the two marks in respect of all goods in Class 11.CommentThis decision is a textbook… [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 10:49 am by Jack Goldsmith, Matt Gluck
The regulations specify that “a pardon is granted on the basis of the petitioner's demonstrated good conduct for a substantial period of time after conviction and service of sentence. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Peter Ling
 Picture on the right (c) by Dr Judit Banhidi [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 1:36 pm by tom
For instance, you must provide: (1) the registration number for the prior registration; and (2) a specific statement explaining that: (a) the mark in the new application is identical to the mark in the cancelled or expired registration; (b) the goods/services in the new application are identical to, or narrower than, the goods/services in the cancelled or expired registration; and (c) the owner of the prior registration is the same as the owner of the new… [read post]
Article 12 is, however, ambiguous as to whether beneficiaries of temporary protection are entitled to such public goods on the basis of equal treatment. [read post]
Waiver of PUA Overpayments  State agencies can waive repayment requirements for individuals who mistakenly received overpayment for PUA to which they were not entitled, if the overpayment was not the individual’s fault and such repayment would be contrary to equity and good conscience. [read post]