Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 7,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2011, 1:04 pm
(Note: I have not seen a transcript of the argument so this is reconstructed from my notes and, except where I use quotation marks, does not purport to be a verbatim account. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
” I wonder if members of Congress are catching on. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:17 am
I would prefer to think of Bush v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 2:45 am
Mexico considered the annexation of Texas as an act of war, and after border skirmishes, President Polk asked for the war declaration, since in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, only Congress can declare a war. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:55 am
Sex Discrimination Regulations and LGBT Non-Discrimination – Again, I would not expect significant changes here. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 12:19 pm
” I'm noting this to point out a rich OpEd in today's Dallas Morning News by Baylor Law prof Mark Osler, "The slow fade of Len Bias' ghost. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:19 am
I presume that Scott Adams is somewhat conservative, and that’s why he often writes for the Wall St. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:22 pm
” To the Editor: The May 20, 2007 Op-Ed Section carries an essay by Mark Helprin urging that Congress extend the term of copyrights to perperuity or close to it. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
For our latest installment, we turn to lawyer and comic book collector Mark Zaid of The Law Office of Mark S. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:52 pm
The late Senator John McCainOne of the great things about living in a place like Washington, DC is that you get to meet members of Congress in the course of an ordinary day. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
Stephanie recently visited the Law Library of Congress and blogged about her experience. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:05 am
I urge every one of you to take a stand on this issue important issue. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:52 pm
But surely Congress did not pass the Lanham Act in 1946 and codify common law trademark protection simply because Congress wanted companies to invest in catchy names and fancy logos? [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
That was an ominous sign for the Government and the high water mark for the challengers. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
The court’s use of the word “recharacterized” marks an important rhetorical move: it rejects the notion that Trump replacement of the Muslim ban with a territory-based ban was intended to promote national security and instead views the territory-based ban as a pretext for the original Muslim ban. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
Despite a few clunkers, they have, on the whole, been much better than I expected, and some are even outstanding. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:04 am
I do want to pick up on Mark Tushnet's post, regarding her article on Presidential Administration. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:27 am
(I support mens rea reform, and I expect to be writing more to help it along in the new Congress, where I do not expect it to face opposition -- and, indeed, I expect it to receive support -- from Pres. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:40 pm
But it misses the mark in the trade show industry, where success often comes from making a memorable first impression that helps your brand stand out on the show floor. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
In February the Yale Law Journal held a symposium on “The Meaning of the Civil Rights Revolution,” to mark the publication of Bruce Ackerman’s book, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution: It was a terrific conference, and a fitting tribute to Professor Ackerman’s accomplishments. [read post]
