Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 9,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am
The Court, however, applying the principles of construction established in Arnold v Britton, Wood v Capita and Rainy Sky, found that on a correct construction, the 1997 licence only licensed Ford’s US federal trade marks, and not any others. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:57 pm
The band attempted to register its name as a trademark but United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) refused the registration. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 11:40 am
" United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 1:59 am
However, the use of the mark on the dissenters’ website did not cause confusion because their website clearly noted that it was distinct from the LNC (Libertarian National Committee, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am
United States and heard oral argument in Bullcoming v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:14 pm
If they did, the Chevron framework in administrative law would be hard to justify-at least if Chevron is to be justified, as it is in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:43 pm
See Tull v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:47 am
Luxco, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:22 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petitioner v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:22 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Petitioner v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:45 am
Advocacy organizations, scholars, and minority groups worried that these decisions opened the floodgates to the United States Patent and Trademark Office registering the vilest and most prejudicial terms in the U.S. lexicon, ossifying hatred. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 12:52 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2024.html United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:44 am
Chanel established that it began using its mark in the United States in the 1930s, and the mark has consistently been ranked as one of the most recognized and famous brands in the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 10:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:22 pm
As another recent article notes, the restaurant industry is no stranger to trademark issues, including the lawsuit recently launched by the Wild Wing restaurant chain in Aurora, Ontario against Buffalo Wild Wings, a United States franchise operator that is expanding into Canada. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:09 am
On June 25, 2010, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB") of the United States Patent and Trademark Office rendered its decision in the case of Valentino U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:53 pm
V. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:54 am
Audemars Piquet Holding S.A. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
The contract clause of the United States Constitution restricts the power of states to disrupt contractual arrangements. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:18 am
– United States District Court – Western District of North Carolina – December 11th, 2015 – This is a negligence and loss of consortium case involving falling ice. [read post]
