Search for: "May v. Austin"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 2,236
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 8:47 am
Americans For Fair Patent Use, LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:31 am
In that ruling, Grutter v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
Austin (In re Austin), 271 B.R. 97 (Bankr. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Austin v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:26 pm
The court reviewed a prior case, Austin v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
SYNTHETIC DRUG BUSTS: FEDERAL ARRESTS FOR FAKE POT AND DESIGNER DRUGS THAT ARE LEGAL UNDER STATE LAW
31 May 2014, 1:34 pm
(C) Abuse of the drug or other substance may lead to limited physical dependence or psychological dependence relative to the drugs or other substances in schedule III. (5) Schedule V. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
Same with Austin "Jack" DeCoster of Wright County Egg, which was linked to as many as 1,700 illnesses from Salmonella in its eggs in 2010. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am
” To justify that anti-historical and non-textual principle, Roberts relied on some bizarre statements he made in a previous case, Northwest Austin v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
– Fisher v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:55 pm
—Austin 1988, writ denied). [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
Bollinger, permit the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in undergraduate admissions decisions. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:59 am
Randall v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:50 pm
The case: Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:26 am
" (Clean Energy v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 5:20 am
Barclay, which is from the 1994, opinion of the Austin Court of Appeals. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm
On these subjects Judge Cacheris stated as follows:"First, Beaumont relies significantly on Austin v. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:14 am
Austin Ind., 544 F.3d 1192 (11th Cir. 2008). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 8:26 am
Holder v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:33 pm
This Court has recognized that Section 5′s intrusion on state sovereignty raises serious constitutional questions” (citing the 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
