Search for: "Murray v. Murray" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2021, 5:58 pm by INFORRM
Russia Nicola Murray, Deputy Head of the Delegation to the OSCE raised concerns about Russia’s treatment of journalists and independent media in a recent statement at the OSCE Permanent Council. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
 Mr Soriano’s application in January 2023 for an anti-suit injunction on the grounds that it was vexatious, oppressive and unconscionable and would interfere with the efficient conduct of these proceedings was dismissed by Murray J. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 3:42 am by INFORRM
On 8 and 9 February 2022, there was a hearing in Vardy v Rooney before Mrs Justice Steyn. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
He also analysed Murray (which grapples with the effect of publication of children’s facial features) and held that it did not mandate a context-free assessment of whether there was a REP. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am by Alex Bailin QC, Matrix
He also analysed Murray (which grapples with the effect of publication of children’s facial features) and held that it did not mandate a context-free assessment of whether there was a REP. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:34 am by Simon Chester
Murray’s affidavit of records. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 8:22 am by administrator
[iv] A good description of how a local government contracted with a church to operate a shelter is written in the case of Greentree at Murray Hill Condo. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
  Of course, the photographs in that case concerned a child and, as we know from Murray v Express Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 446, different considerations apply. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:36 am by INFORRM
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457),  McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73),  Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481) – and that Mr Justice Eady was not party to a single one of these decisions (although appeals against his rulings were dismissed in McKennitt and Lord Browne). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:37 am by INFORRM
Lord Walker then considers the issue of photographs, referring to the Campbell, Murray and Von Hannover cases. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:47 pm by Michael
In da hood: “If ya’v eva bin injad ina ak-sid-dent…” Or let’s try running over a cute cartoon animal – to win the sympathy vote. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:27 am
Fortunately for the IPKat, guidance came in the form of a note from his friend Gill Grassie (Maclay Murray & Spens LLP) on a hot topic that pits copyight against some countervailing public interests: the decision of Lord Woolman, sitting in the Court of Session, in Petition by the British Broadcasting Corporation for Access to Crown Productions in the case of Her Majesty's Advocate v Kimberley Mary Hainey (which you can read in full here). [read post]