Search for: "Nixon v. Nixon"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,453
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2007, 12:57 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:34 am
Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s 1997 decision in Raines v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm
This is the case for law-making pursuant to Article I, Section 7, for admitting new states to the union pursuant to Article IV, Section 3, and even for calling a new constitutional convention pursuant to Article V. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
Nominado por Nixon, hace cuarenta años que es juez. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:57 am
(Should we automatically be more deferential to lawyer-presidents like Richard Nixon or Bill Clinton?) [read post]
17 May 2009, 11:19 am
The case is called United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
The Assange indictment may seem reminiscent of the Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:39 am
This was after Eugene V. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
In Medellin v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 9:56 am
Can you imagine if Loving v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
The threat of judicial action, such as the specter of overturning Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:39 am
Nixon briefly considered him for a Supreme Court appointment. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:27 am
" As U.S. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in Roe v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:56 am
” He referred to the Watergate investigation of President Richard Nixon and the Whitewater investigation of President Bill Clinton. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:04 am
That opinion, in turn, was probably prompted by the Watergate scandal; it was issued the day after Nixon resigned. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:01 pm
”Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg expressed genuine appreciation for the draft dissent Scalia delivered to her privately, before circulating it to the conference, in the 1996 case of United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]
