Search for: "ONLY A MILE v STATE"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 2,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2008, 4:31 pm
By Dave Lanferman Silicon Valley Taxpayers Ass’n v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:46 am
He could only state the following: Q: How certain were you that the defendant was speeding? [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:07 am
On the contrary, the Germans started employing new weapons of indiscriminate killing—V-1 and V-2 rockets. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 7:41 am
WCC’s response was that the only relevant question for the reviewing officer was whether the offered property met her needs and that the Council’s resources and forecasts of likely future demand were relevant when deciding whether an offer was reasonably practical (relying on R (Calgin) v Enfield LBC). [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:00 am
County of Madera (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 1099, in which the court stated that a WSA is only required if a public water system is impacted. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 12:02 pm
In PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 12:12 pm
In PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:18 am
This week, in Stewart v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:07 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:54 pm
The 18th District is 165 miles long, and only five miles wide at some places . . . [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:14 pm
The following contribution to our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:59 pm
The revised settlement also contemplated $1 million for the PAGA claims—up from $122K—with the state to get 75 percent of that amount. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
One difficulty is that, as the Supreme Court stated in the 1987 case of South Dakota v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 10:07 pm
They claimed violation of state antitrust laws only. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
” Copyright Litigation Handbook § 9:9 (Motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim ) (2010). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
May 14, 2007).Not only that, courts applying Alabama law have rejected market share liability, Franklin County School Board v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 10:46 am
In Parrott v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:00 am
In his dissenting opinion in Chew Heong v. [read post]
