Search for: "P V Holding Corporation" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,781
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:24 am by John Mikhail
” In my last post, I suggested that this provision has been unduly neglected in recent commentary on the N&P Clause, a theme to which I will return. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:46 am by WSLL
” This holding is affirmed. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:18 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  This gives clarity to practitioners attempting to draft commercial agreements (for example, joint ventures) that will hold water even if a counterparty goes bust, and indeed gives welcome support to the fundamental English law principle of freedom of contract. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:46 pm by Stefan Passantino
 At present, the professors assert, shareholders are unable to hold directors and officers accountable when they spend corporate funds on politics in a way that departs from the interests of the company. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It also is the ultimate ground of the Court’s holding in McCulloch v. [read post]