Search for: "Pass v. State"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 28,408
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Constitution explicitly protects economic liberty with the Contract Clause, forbidding any state from passing any "law impairing the obligation of contracts. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor passed away today at the age of 93. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am
Thus: Because Montana does not have an important government interest in regulating foreign affairs, and because the State has not demonstrated the Legislature’s consumer protection interest in passing the bill, it is likely that Plaintiffs will succeed in showing SB 419 does not advance an important government interest as stated in the Act’s preamble and text. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:03 am
Casey (1992), Virginia v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
The couple returned to the United States in 1957. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am
Reports state that calm has since been restored to the area. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
In this regard, Section 2 of the VRA would seem to pass muster. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:34 pm
Paxton, are concerning newly passed state laws in Florida and Texas that purport to regulate social media companies. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:41 am
In particular, NAGR and Bevis point to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:00 am
District Court for the District of Minnesota (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
” Kansas v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 5:07 am
Sulier v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had passed, Harrow sought an extension of time to file his petition. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
In Wiseman v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
Ct. 1367, 1374 (2020), which stated in passing that “the § 315(b)-barred party can join a[n existing IPR] proceeding initiated by another petitioner. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his employment". [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his employment". [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 2:15 pm
By Chris Holman Purdue Pharma L.P. v. [read post]
