Search for: "People v Court" Results 1181 - 1200 of 61,621
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  Between 2019-2023, travel to Oakland decreased by nearly 2 million people, which the OAK attributes to the Covid-19 pandemic. [read post]
5 May 2024, 12:05 pm by Ilya Somin
Legacy preferences in college admissions have come under increasing criticism in recent years, especially in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision curbing the use of racial preferences in SFFA v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:13 am by SHG
The Supreme Court, in its recent Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 1:25 pm by David Bernstein
" The Supreme Court ruled that protesters do not have a right to camp out even on public property devoted to public use, like national parks, in Clark v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Thousands of people driving while impaired on opioids or other narcotics are attracting the attention of law enforcement. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:23 pm
But the type of harshness you see here is not his usual forte.Four conduct has to really hack off the Court of Appeal to get an opinion like this one, and from a justice like this one, no less.Hopefully people will learn the underlying lesson. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or… [read post]
In the many cases (at the lower courts and the Supreme Court) upholding parts or all of regulations and court injunctions limiting protestor activity near clinic entrances and procedure rooms, noise has been one of the factors courts have held can be meaningfully taken into account by regulators because the noise itself interferes with a clinic’s function, and that harm must be considered alongside the interests of the protestors.CleanlinessAnother… [read post]