Search for: "People v West" Results 1181 - 1200 of 3,131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
According to Ofcom, the broadcasts did not include a full list of candidates for European elections in the South West. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
We reiterate, however, that each case is fact specific (see, People v West, 271 AD2d 806; People v Brooks, 270 AD2d 206, lv denied 95 NY2d 794; People v Parr, 155 AD2d 945, lv denied 75 NY2d 870 [all holding that a defendant who performs a significant act of domestic violence against a mother in the presence of a child is guilty of endangering the welfare of that child]). [95 N.Y.2d 374] With respect to defendant's appeal, the… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Jackson Women’s Health Organization), does not repudiate Meyer and Pierce so much as complete the recasting of their concerns (together with those of West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 2:26 pm
Bill Ruthhart of the Indianapolis Star reports this afternoon on the Supreme Court decision earlier today in the case of City of Carmel, Indiana v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:29 pm
Benn was co-counsel for Johnson v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 9:02 am by admin
The most important one is an obscure case called Stern v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Additionally, Judge Seeger then said the courts are not bound to follow decisions of equal or inferior courts, citing People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:17 am
And he rightly points out that it raises the potential for conflicting judgments in cases involving former Chadian dictator Habré -- not necessarily the 2009 decision of the African Court of Human and People's Rights about which we've posted, but rather the eventual judgment in Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:29 am by Laura Orr
" (link to full Statesman-Journal article) 2) Read the September 30, 2009, State v. [read post]