Search for: "People v. Edwards"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2021, 4:17 pm
United StatesCNN v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am
Edward Markey wrote to DHS back in February urging the agency to cease use of the app, due to its inaccessibility to many intending applicants, adding that “we cannot allow it to create a tiered system that treats asylum seekers differently based on their economic status — including the ability to pay for travel — language, nationality, or race. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
More importantly their peoples must be protected against heresy and more importantly--apostasy. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 04, 2008 US v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
Canada The case of Hudspeth v Whatcott 2017 ONSC 1708 concerned a proposed class action on behalf of 500,000 people who marched on the 2016 Pride Toronto Parade. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:20 pm
Last year it became the first UK newspaper to win the Pulitzer Prize for the Edward Snowden revelations about US state surveillance. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 6:33 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:30 am
It’s been one year since the Guardian first published the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court order, leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, that demonstrated that the NSA was conducting dragnet surveillance on millions of innocent people. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm
Media reports we found notably balanced, accurate or otherwise helpful to transparency this week Rachel Johnson’s report of Owens v Owens for the Daily Mail, as acknowledged here by Jo Edwards of Resolution: Spot on re #nofaultdivorce & urgent need for reform @RachelSJohnson (even if some reader comments are out of touch) https://t.co/WIgMtSHOAg — Jo Edwards (@MissJoEdwards) March 26, 2017 A cluster of constructive local press reports about social work… [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 pm
Three of those people, Joseph Fischer, Edward Lang, and Garret Miller, filed pretrial motions to dismiss their charges under 18 U.S.C. section 1512(c)(2), arguing that the charges fail to state an offense against them. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:08 pm
Let’s talk about Friedrichs v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
There's no indication that he's got any United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
However, I often find that time is an elusive concept and for me the “nearness” of Noble v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm
After all, many rights are powers reserved to the People rather than delegated to the Government. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
In a similar vein, Equifax has been fined £500,000 by the ICO (the press release can be found here and Equifax’s response here) for its failure to protect the personal data of over 15 million people in the UK following a breach in 2017. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 1:39 pm
The gist is that people have a protected right to gather. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:21 pm
Nick Bolter of the London office of Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge explained that in the UK there are bifurcated proceedings, i.e. two trials - one for liability and one for damages. [read post]
