Search for: "People v. Good (1990)" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,303
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
One had to demonstrate that it was “fair, just and reasonable” (Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605) before there could be any liability at common law. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:12 am
Thanks to the nice people at Prawfs for letting me crash on the couch for another month. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
There will be other chances to convince other panels of the Court of Appeal that our view of Conte - and of the scope of products liability generally - ought to prevail.So with that in mind, we offer our closing arguments on Conte, for the good of the order. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:56 pm
" At this point, if you're the employer, you're feeling pretty good about the case, however, things took a turn and the grievance was allowed. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 7:00 am
Agenda items should include a Basel re-do, the way forward for cross-border banking after U.K v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 4:52 am
Tex. 1990).[2] The court also referenced the following cases in support of this same proposition: Parfums Givenchy Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:03 pm
  Indeed, until as recently as 1990, U.S. immigration law excluded gay people from coming into the country. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 8:15 am
As sankyu correctly pointed out, the case I wrote about in the post - People v. [read post]