Search for: "People v. Ing"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,405
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2019, 2:56 pm
The People of the State of California v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
As a result, the legislature is, to use the words of the Cook Court, “favor[ing]” one candidate, and thereby “disfavor[ing]” the rest (since single-seat elections are zero-sum affairs). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm
The appellant instead relied on O’Connor v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
On reply, Willard argued that “the law in New York plainly favors a buy-out as opposed to the liquidation of an on-going company – certainly one like Matrix that employs several dozen or hundreds of people at any given time. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
There are a handful of other cases that reinforce the thrust of Ex Parte United States: People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
In dissent, Judge Gabriel Sanchez criticized the majority’s approach for “significantly erod[ing] the heightened pleading requirements for alleging securities fraud under the PSLRA. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:08 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:25 am
Yes, people do ask medical questions there too. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 9:32 pm
The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is therefore vacated as moot.The case, U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:41 pm
While the elimination of marital fault is extremely important and would greatly benefit people seeking divorce here in Rochester and elsewhere in New York State, it is the bill dealing with temporary spousal support that is likely to present some significant legal issues if it becomes law. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:24 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:33 am
(the trade or exchange of a good, see Gibbons v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:59 pm
A v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:23 pm
The opinion does not discuss the consequences of such a designation or why it was disputed, but I am guessing that either it would limit the property rights of California almond growers in some manner or there is a group of people named “Almond” in California who really *#&%ing hate bees. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 9:10 am
In September 2018, the SEC announced a $54 million award to two people. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:07 am
However, it is notable that in Patterson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm
” The announcement of this new rule comes on the heels of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Texas Dept. of Housing Community Affairs v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:09 am
In Tidwell v. [read post]
