Search for: "People v. Ing" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,831
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
Just last year, the Justice Department reversed its century-old prohibition against recording interrogations and adopted a policy “establish[ing] a presumption that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), and the United States Marshals Service (USMS) will electronically record statements made by individuals in their custody. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm by Kim Kirschenbaum
” The announcement of this new rule comes on the heels of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Texas Dept. of Housing Community Affairs v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
The government claims that Webster waived any objection to this enhancement by `agree[ing]”’to it and `recommend[ing]’ it in his plea agreement, . . . and consenting to it during the sentencing hearing. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:58 am
The chief question is whether the exclusion of “disparag[ing]” marks violates the First Amendment. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 12:55 pm
To the extent that Defendant has freely entered the public square and “thrust himself into the vortex of th[ese] public issue[s],” Gertz v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 2:04 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, DVM, Esq.
In Rhode Island HSUS has recently announced that it plans to go after state Senator V. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:31 am
The phone was being `pinged’ by another source, that is, it was `vibrat[ing] and flash[ing] and kind of mak[ing] a funny noise. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
This post examines a California Court of Appeals opinion  that deals with the  prosecution of a juvenile for “commit[ing] a criminal threat. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:55 pm
McConnell: [The provisions in the Patriot Act] removed bureaucratic barriers that had kept intelligence officials and criminal investigators from sharing information, a simple but major shift that FBI director Robert Mueller has credited with "significantly alter[ing] the landscape for conducting terrorism investigations. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The first is a case that considers the extent to which the First Amendment protects against prosecution individuals who utter words that cause objectively reasonable people to feel fear (Elonis v. [read post]