Search for: "People v. Michaels" Results 1181 - 1200 of 4,661
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: USTR reveals ACTA information (Michael Geist), (Managing IP), (Michael Geist) (Outlaw.com) More insights into ACTA Wikileaks, WIPO threat etc (IPJur), (Lenz Blog), (Michael Geist), (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist), (IP Watch) Schneider Electric… [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:27 am by JB
See Loving 388 U.S., at 12; Lawrence,539 U.S., at 566–567.Another way of putting this is the the debate between Justice Brennan and Justice Scalia in Michael H. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 9:16 am
  This, of course, is one of those ridiculous legal fictions that only a court could indulge.Orin Kerr notes the decision by 10th Circuit Judge Michael McConnell in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Michael Dorf remarks that although last week’s Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. [read post]