Search for: "People v. Mines"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2011, 8:49 am
To see this idea, we need look no further than Massachusetts’s landmark same-sex marriage decision, Goodridge v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 7:32 am
A little while later I had the jarring experience of realizing that ads for charity auctions on behalf of orthodox educational institutions — including a client of mine! [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:32 pm
Now Esolen sounds like Chua's mortal adversary: Slacker Dad v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 6:55 am
(Note that Reason.com is described as our “blog forum host,” according to the plaintiff’s Exhibit 6, simply because Reason.com had published my Reason.tv interview and once published a column of mine, and because it had published a set of short items about D.C. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 12:13 pm
It’s a rich mine of interesting and important law. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
After spending several days hearing snippets of the prosecution's case in State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 12:23 am
(See, e.g., Facebook v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:00 am
In a ruling by summary order, the panel concluded that none of the three sets of statements at issue constituted a material misstatement or omission (Martin v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:20 pm
By anyone's standards, certainly by mine, that was a big haul. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:01 pm
My favorite example is the 1968 case of United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 6:30 am
First: One theory of the authority of the Federalist Papers (only sort of mine) is that they deserve no special status on account of their authors or their role in ratification — they simply reflect the views of smart, educated people at the time of the Founding and therefore are a useful datum in originalist interpretation. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:59 am
I’ve gotten to know Nick over the last couple of years and he’s flat out one of my favorite people on the planet. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:38 am
So, when I read Pouncil v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:27 am
Supreme Court case of Davis v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
This was the situation facing the defense lawyers in the case Armedi v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:19 am
See Mini's Cupcakes v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 10:01 am
” United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:15 pm
., U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm
Several people counseled him against a second clerkship especially with a “progressive” judge. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:36 am
”(emphasis mine) Ill. [read post]
