Search for: "Pictures Words, Inc."
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,288
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2009, 10:15 pm
In re LaBellarte, Serial No. 76526520 (May 29, 2009) [not precedential].part of Applicant's fifth specimen(click on figure for larger picture)The original specimen, an advertising brochure states that "Outsider has developed its editing and design environments around its proprietary soft room principle. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
Columbia Pictures Industries, 204 F.3d 326 (1/28/00). [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:15 am
" In re RK Netmedia, Inc., Serial Nos. 77060742 and 77060766 (May 21, 2009) [not precedential].Marc Randazza (well-regarded First Amendment lawyer and blogmaster of The Legal Satyricon) argued on behalf of Applicant that the word "cum" is not scandalous "in the context of the marketplace as applied to only the goods or services in the application for registration. [read post]
15 May 2009, 3:31 pm
International Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
Wallingford Board of Education, 195 F.3d 134 (2d Cir. 1999), is perhaps her most strongly worded opinion addressing discrimination. [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:26 am
" This standard wrongly imports an objective "reason to know" that is not implicit in ordinary usage of the word "knowledge. [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:26 am
" This standard wrongly imports an objective "reason to know" that is not implicit in ordinary usage of the word "knowledge. [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:54 pm
© 2009 Vicki Voisin, Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:03 am
" In ICAN Enterprise, Inc. et al v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:52 pm
And I appreciate DRI President Marc Williams' kind words here. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 12:42 am
Replace the word "Iowans" with "Americans" and "Iowa's court" with "the U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:45 pm
See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Wal-Mart, Inc., nos. 04-16688 & 04-16720. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 11:08 pm
In the Bayh-Dole world, the federal government generally stays out of the picture, and deals are made between the federal grantee as licensor and the private licensee. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:15 am
Outdoor Kids, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 11:45 pm
In other words, the consumer must view such picture in order to reach the order form that comprises the Applicant's tendered specimen. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:07 pm
While the item could have been clearly worded to denote "intentional incapacitation of the victim," as the question stands it would require a mind reader to detect whether any affirmative response corresponds to this legal definition of rape.[17] Koss, however, insisted that her criteria conformed with the legal definitions of rape used in some states, and she cited in particular the statute on rape of her own state, Ohio [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:26 am
The filing paints a picture of Heller's shrinking capital coffers as a steady stream of partners left in 2008. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 5:45 pm
Law.com posted an article (link here) regarding the trade dress enforcement efforts undertaken by Energy Brands, Inc. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 5:55 am
The California Supreme Court case Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
