Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 1181 - 1200 of 178,346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2016, 10:57 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The Facts of the Case The plaintiffs car was struck from behind by the defendant’s vehicle when the two were in stop-and-go traffic. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
.), the court denied a carrier’s Motion to Dismiss a Plaintiffs breach of contract and bad faith claims in a UIM case. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 10:49 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
The plaintiff alleged that, after the first defendant’s vehicle came to a stop, the second defendant’s vehicle suddenly accelerated through the intersection, hit the median, and struck the front driver’s side of her vehicle. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 6:14 pm by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Plaintiff appealed on two bases: 1) “that a reasonable juror could have concluded that [defendant] was negligent under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur,” and 2) that plaintiff had “presented evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact as to a witness’s credibility. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
 Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.I send thanks to the prevailing Plaintiffs attorney, Steven A. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 10:24 am by Steven M. Sweat
Both sides in the case agreed that the speed of the defendant’s car was no more than 15 mph when it struck the plaintiffs vehicle. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 1:08 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
May 19, 2016), the plaintiff suffered injuries after falling over a tote box on the floor of the defendant’s store. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 1:08 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
May 19, 2016), the plaintiff suffered injuries after falling over a tote box on the floor of the defendant’s store. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm
Infant plaintiffs mother (herein “plaintiff-mother”) is a physician Board Certified in Internal Medicine. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:58 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
While the court did not explicitly say so, the fact that the plaintiff was not diligent in amending the complaint likely played a role in the court’s decision. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:58 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
While the court did not explicitly say so, the fact that the plaintiff was not diligent in amending the complaint likely played a role in the court’s decision. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 10:37 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
The CFPB asserted that the plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge the Taskforce’s membership. [read post]