Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 1181 - 1200 of 55,682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2009, 2:02 am
Independent Trustee Services Ltd v Hope and others [2009] EWHC 2810 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 325 "As a matter of law, the existence of the Pension Protection Fund was not a factor that trustees of a pension scheme might legitimately take into account in the exercise of a power to buy out scheme benefits. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 1:50 am
Independent Trustee Services Ltd v Hope and Others Chancery Division "As a matter of law, the existence of the Pension Protection Fund was not a factor that trustees of a pension scheme could legitimately take into account in the exercise of a power to buy out scheme benefits. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:47 am
Bovale Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2009] EWCA Civ 171; [2009] WLR (D) 94 “A judge had no power to alter the Civil Procedure Rules either by a judgment or practice direction or to vary or alter any practice direction which was binding on the court to which it [...] [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:30 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
“Redd treats §3582(c)(2) as if it countermanded the basic determinate-sentence system and bestowed on district judges a continuing power to adjust sentences-a power that would last indefinitely, unlike the older system limiting that power to 120 days after the final appellate [...] [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:48 am
How Appealing has a couple posts on today's oral argument before the Supreme Court in Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
Circuit granted the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) motion to stay the vacatur of the Trump administration’s Clean Power Plan Repeal Rule until EPA conducts further rulemaking on the issue in the case of American Lung Association v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 1:15 pm by Darius Gambino
For many reasons, the powerful dissent from Justices Thomas and Alito may be the better opinion. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am by INFORRM
And, it may also be important that judicial review of a refusal to authorise is no longer available following the decision of the Supreme Court in A, R (on the application of) v B [2009] UKSC 12 (summary here) but rather to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 3:10 pm by Jeff Gamso
And where the right to suicide by prison guard is, at least for the moment, inviolate.Haugen v Kitzhaber 1st ruling [read post]