Search for: "Prince v. State"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 1,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
"[A] requirement of evidence of authenticity...applies to all writings whose relevancy depends upon authorship by a particular person" (Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 9-101 [Farrell 11th Ed]). [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:13 pm
” Brenman v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
The Court stated that a term will only be implied if it satisfies the case of “business necessity” or it is “so obvious that it goes without saying”. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
The gage and emblem of this freedom is the sovereign state. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
The agency explained that the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
There are no adjudicated PCC complaints to report but resolved complaints include: Sally Low v The Independent, Clause 1, 27/01/2012; Mr Syed Ahmad v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Colin Philip v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; David Bret v The Sun, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Damien Collis v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012, Mr Peter Reynolds v Lancashire Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012 Karen Birch v Oldham Evening… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
Among the privacy cases of early 2011 was MNB v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:46 pm
The State invited her to be director in large schools in the central region of Porto Alegre (near where we lived), but she also never accepted. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm
HRH The Duchess of Cambridge and HRH Prince George of Cambridge v OK! [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 5:59 am
Section II-A argued that the test of Lemon v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:46 pm
The apparent justification was that she was a family member of a PEP, a reference to her father, who is the son of Prince Michael of Kent and 43rd in line to the throne. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:33 pm
This is kind of ridiculous even without the Roman numerals (though I could give you about XCIV reasons why you shouldn’t go above V with those). [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
The designation "Fürst", and its feminine form "Fürstin", mean "prince" and "princess" respectively. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:58 pm
He guards the sleep of his pauper master as if he were a prince. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 8:43 am
Prince George School Board, and Arnold v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
