Search for: "Public Defender of the State of Delaware" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,566
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2011, 1:56 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Attorney's Office District of Delaware on June 29, 2011 released the following press release: "United States Attorney Charles M. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:56 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Attorney's Office District of Delaware on June 29, 2011 released the following press release: "United States Attorney Charles M. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:02 am by Steve Bainbridge
The defendant argued that the corporation failed to state a claim because it suffered no loss through the purchase of its stock, but the court disagreed. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:57 pm by Steve Bainbridge
"(93) The defendants appealed the case to the United States Supreme Court as part of the four case litigation encompassed in Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
Paul, Minn., $50,000 - This conference grant will sponsor a conference to help researchers understanding the interactions of human pathogens and plants and how to prevent them.University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb., $2,354,004 - This project will examine Shiga-toxigenic E. coli in beef cattle in an effort to reduce the number of contaminations each year.University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb., $500,000 - This project will develop improved methods for detecting milk and peanut residues in processed… [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am by Marie Louise
(Patent Docs) (Patently-O) CAFC affirms section 337 violation in MemsTech appeal (2010-1018) (ITC Law Blog) District Court Delaware: Except for ‘truly regional defendants’, considering location of witnesses and discovery in venue analysis is ‘outdated, irrelevant, and should be give’: XPRT Ventures, LLC v. eBay Inc., et. al. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In considering whether or not directors should face a greater threat of punishment, I think it is critical to note that in his column Davidoff only refers to civil litigation (specifically, Delaware state court litigation and federal securities litigation). [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:04 am by Keith Rizzardi
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and related defendants to proceed with dredging project to deepen main navigation channel of Delaware River from 40 feet to 45 feet, allegedly without obtaining requisite federal and state approval pursuant to Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, Coastal Zone Management Act and Delaware Code. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm by Bexis
  In M.G., the Third Circuit “note[d] the well-established principle that a federal court sitting in diversity, when called upon to make a prediction of state law, should act conservatively” in reversing a prediction that Delaware would adopt medical monitoring. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(IP Spotlight) District Court Delaware: Infringement warrants permanent injunction but with 15-month ‘sunset provision’ to allow defendant time to introduce noninfringing product: B. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  Thus, it's even odder that the burden is placed on the defendant, since in most states, and certainly in the Third Restatement, an alternative design is an essential element of a design-related cause of action.Then the court really veered off. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:08 pm by Bruce Carton
Fulbright & Jaworski finds itself as the "mockee" in such a video (below) following a judge's ruling against its client (the publication Variety) in a motion to transfer the case from Delaware to California. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:00 am by zshapiro
The Courts that have upheld warrantless GPS searches have cited the 1983 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Aug.25, 2005), stating that a plaintiff “seek[ing] to recover for injuries to his person resulting from [a defendant’s] alleged violation of the TCPA [that's the Tennessee statute's abbreviaton]” must be dismissed. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
  In response, the accused infringer asserted that this evidence fell within the public records exception to the hearsay rule, FRE 803(8), and was admissible. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:50 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
" Confidentiality of Court Documents and Proceedings in General VC Laster said that efforts to keep data and court proceedings confidential, must overcome the presumption in the Delaware state constitution that court proceedings are open to the public. [read post]