Search for: "S. T. "
Results 1181 - 1200
of 743,050
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2017, 2:32 am
At the end of the oral proceedings, the chairman pronounced the Board's decision.IX. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 7:30 pm
We can’t stop it, but we can use it. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:01 pm
However, the amendment/correction as now contained in claim 1 was not the only possible correction as a person skilled in the art would have to decide between the correction of “170 L (TTA) –> S (TCA)” to “175 L (TTA) –> S (TCA)” or to “170 F (TTC) –> S (TCA)”, i.e. between a correction of the position of the mutation or the correction of the amino acid at position 170 and of the corresponding codon. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:30 pm
The road is long With many a winding turn That leads us to we know where We know when The Court ain’t strong Strong enough to uphold our rights He ain’t heavy, he’s Miranda So on we go State’s welfare is their concern No burden should they bear We’ll get there, we’ll get there For I know He should not encumber me He ain’t heavy, he’s Miranda If I’m laden at all I’m laden with sadness… [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
READ NOW » Related Content Texas Federal Court ‘Sets Aside’ FTC’s Noncompete Clause Rule Compare the Ryan LLC case’s outcome with ATS Tree Services v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 12:59 am
Now, it's attributed to Brooks, but I don't know if it's true. [read post]
21 May 2015, 2:47 pm
Government $31.5 Million for Allegedly Violating Controlled Substance Ac t and False Claims Act appeared first on TZ Legal - Fraud Fighters. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 6:34 am
"However, that doesn't mean they have to. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:35 am
“AT&T’s Picturephone, shown at the 1964 World’s Fair, was a huge flop. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 12:51 pm
The post AT&T launches She’s Connected contest for women-owned small businesses first appeared on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 11:01 am
For this reason, the composition of the OD violated A 19(2), first sentence.[4] Violations of A 19(2) were considered to be substantial procedural violations which led to a remittal of the case under A 111(1) and to the reimbursement of the appeal fee in several cases (see decisions T 251/88, T 939/91, T 382/92, T 476/95, T 838/02, T 1349/10).[5] The Board is aware that in two of the cases mentioned above (T 251/88 and T… [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 5:45 am
Law Office of David S. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 8:29 am
I don’t find that they’ve been proven unsuccessful, but I don’t know how they could be at this stage. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
See G 2/92 [2], J 3/09 [3.5.2] and T 2495/11 [2.1-2]. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
As a consequence, the board would likely confirm the finding of loss of rights noted in the registrar's communication of 19 April 2016 in a decision. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
As a consequence, the board would likely confirm the finding of loss of rights noted in the registrar's communication of 19 April 2016 in a decision. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 8:37 am
Whatever you do, don’t drive if you’ve been using marijuana. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:41 am
And, you know, we didn't put it then-that's what we will do now. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
”Apparently, All Day wasn’t pleased that the individual hadn’t disclosed her needs during the interview process, and immediately terminated her. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:32 pm
The post Partner’s Name Isn’t On The Door… It’s On The Whole Practice Area appeared first on Above the Law. [read post]
