Search for: "STATE v. FIELDS" Results 1181 - 1200 of 12,936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2013, 10:43 am by Greg Mersol
  The Dukes case and others have certainly helped to level the playing field for employers. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:42 am by James P. Yudes, Esq.
The case is, Steele V Steele, and it was approved for publication today as I write this on, April 30, 2021. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:31 am by Andrew Smith, Matrix Chambers.
The Court noted the health and safety objective of the European legislation, which sought to impose minimum standards of rest (daily, weekly and annually) in each member state.  [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm by INFORRM
And does it necessarily imply a draconian framework of state interference? [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 9:19 am
Roberts, Jr., dropped a fascinating hint that the breadth of Congress' revision of federal habeas rules in 1996 might play a major role in determining the fate of one of the Court's most important precedents in the field: Teague v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
That was the result in the recent case of Alaska Flight Services, LLC, v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:53 am by jonathanturley
United States, 567 U.S. 387, 399 (2012), finding “field preemption” of state immigration laws. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:38 am
From August 19 through September 5 many local and state law enforcement officers will be conducting field sobriety checkpoints. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
 One factor was the clinical variability in any case, which was stated to allow being up to 20% off in the regime; another was the influence of the judgment of the pharmacokineticist in a field that was not slavish to calculations. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:31 am
It just a few months ago that this blog reported on the Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev in the Sky v SkyKick, C-371/18 case.important A referral from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales made by Arnold J (as he then was), the Sky case is probably the most important referral in the EU trade mark field made over the past few years. [read post]