Search for: "See v. See" Results 1181 - 1200 of 122,076
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2024, 9:07 pm by Adam Levitin
There will be some lingering legal questions about whether an opt-out provision binds a creditor who received solely publication notice and doesn’t receive or return a ballot, but I have trouble seeing a large number of suits materializing against the Sacklers before statutes of limitations run even if publication notice isn’t binding. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
              In a prior post, I have analyzed the justices’ treatment of the questions presented in the petition in Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:17 am by Josh Richman
  The Court should see this law for what it is: “a sweeping ban on free expression that triggers the most exacting scrutiny under the First Amendment,” the brief argues, adding it will be extremely difficult for the government to justify this total ban. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[1] Thus, for example, Graber showed, among his many other myth-busting insights, that Marbury v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 5:10 am by Claire Phipps-Jones (Bristows)
 While the approach has yet to be adopted in other Local Divisions, one can see that it may take off given the limited hearing time available. [read post]