Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 23,629
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2023, 11:35 am
The challengers had also made a second argument: Under the Supreme Court’s 1970 decision in Pike v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am
Guggenheim Foundation (the Guggenheim) and the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) return the paintings, arguing they were sold under involuntary circumstances.[22] The museums filed suit against Schoeps, asking for the court to rule on the validity of their titles.[23] Ultimately, the museums and Schoeps reached a settlement, and the paintings remain in the museum collections today.[24] Paul von Mendelssohn-Bartholdy ran a family bank that German municipalities targeted and boycotted in 1933.[25] Prior to… [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:00 am
EFF and the ACLU of Northern California filed a lawsuit, called Williams v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 7:48 pm
" Fifth, in Caetano v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 3:47 pm
No surprises there, especially after the Supreme Court’s Google v Oracle decision. [read post]
10 May 2023, 11:17 am
Tague v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:54 am
Dupree v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am
Such a lawsuit could concede that notwithstanding the Supreme Court's invalidation of the Line Item Veto Act in Clinton v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:28 am
If he immediately sells it, he would have no capital gain, and thus, would benefit from significant tax savings. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:15 pm
” For the amended complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/alhathloul-v-darkmatter-group-first-amended-complaint For Exhibit A to the amended complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/alhathloul-v-darkmatter-group-first-amended-complaint-exhibit For Exhibit B to the amended complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/alhathloul-v-darkmatter-group-first-amended-complaint-exhibit-b For more on this case:… [read post]
8 May 2023, 8:51 am
” Iowa Arboretum, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 5:30 am
Here are our leading legal headlines for the week of May 8, 2023 from Wise Law on Twitter:Google liable for $500,000 in damages for not delisting defamatory information: A.B. v GoogleNon-U.S. residents banned from purchasing tickets to Maple Leafs road games in FloridaWitness calls discrimination at the human rights commission a national scandalTransgender Lawmaker Sues Over Removal From Montana House FloorAustralia to ban recreational vaping in e-cigarette crackdownCanada Revenue… [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:00 am
Kelly v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:42 am
The sad reality is that harmful pseudo-science sells, but Amazon has the prerogative and perhaps moral obligation to decide that it won’t take that money. [read post]
6 May 2023, 6:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
” There seems to be only one relevant precedent: Televest v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 8:58 am
” Wood v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 5:42 am
” Hoff v. [read post]
