Search for: "Sex Offender Issues" Results 1181 - 1200 of 11,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2017, 6:39 am by Benson Varghese
That level is then applied to a grid which also considers the individual criminal history of the offender. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:31 am by Bob Kraft
According to Human Rights Watch’s review of sex offender laws, peeing in public in 13 states will get you sent to court and on a sex offender list. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
That law prohibits sex offenders whose victims were minors from participating in any way in these youth organizations. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:17 pm by NBlack
The law provided that registered sex offenders who used social media sites that could be accessed by children could be convicted of a felony. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 5:42 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In its final days of the 2016-17 term, the Supreme Court issued a brief ruling that you may have overlooked. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
North Carolina, in which the Supreme Court struck down a state law banning access by registered sex offenders to some social-media sites, observing that the decision “injected some uncommon good sense into the  debate driven generally by irrational panic and flawed statistics over how the criminal justice system should deal with sex offenders. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 2:16 am by Jeremy Saland
Briefly, some of these requirements are that your criminal convictions do not include sex crimes mandating Sex Offender Registration (SORA), violent offenses as defined by law, “Class “A” felonies or more than one felony in a two criminal conviction total allotment. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 1:26 pm by Jamie Markham
That retroactivity is probably fine when it comes to sex offender registration itself. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:40 am by Robert Loeb, Michael Linhorst
” The Court unanimously held that a North Carolina law prohibiting sex offenders from using social media violated the First Amendment, in part because it prevented the offenders from engaging with their elected officials on those sites. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:00 am by Sevens Legal
It doesn’t matter what sex, age, culture, race, education, religion, employment, or marital status they have. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:00 am by Sevens Legal
It doesn’t matter what sex, age, culture, race, education, religion, employment, or marital status they have. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 11:19 am by sim1koh2
Anyone convicted of a felony for passing such illegal underage pornographic photos would be required to register as a sex offender. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
” That paragraph is not directly at issue here, but it illustrates the extreme breadth of the cyberstalking statute and how it reaches core political speech to the public that is protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:41 am by Jo Dale Carothers
  As the Supreme Court opines, it is a bedrock principle of the First Amendment that “[s]peech may not be banned on the ground that it expresses ideas that offend. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:38 am by David Post
The law in question made it a felony for a registered sex offender “to access a commercial social networking Web site* where the sex offender knows that the site permits minor children to become members or to create or maintain personal Web pages. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
That made him a sex offender under North Carolina law. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:26 pm by John A. Gallagher
Bakers throughout the world have sought to refuse gay customers the right to eat their delicious treats on the grounds that making such a cake would offend their religious beliefs. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 5:43 am by Daniel Schwartz
    I’ve been the first to say that businesses need to be vigilant in order to eliminate sex harassment in the workplace. [read post]