Search for: "Square v. State"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 5,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2014, 1:22 pm
Stating that it did not, the Justices stated that the proposition that a facially neutral law may deny equal protection solely because it has a disparate racial impact “has been squarely and soundly rejected. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:05 pm
By Eric Goldman FPX, LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:59 am
United States, and now Harbison v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 2:28 pm
Finally, in the Court’s first case on the Affordable Care Act (NFIB v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:35 pm
Rialto Citizens for Responsible Growth v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
Breakman v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:53 pm
In Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:14 pm
Supreme Court will rule in the Bilski v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 10:33 am
Lasoff v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 8:13 am
Biolase, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:44 pm
Stroh & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
No. 17-1323 (MN).United States District Court, D. [read post]
20 May 2022, 12:37 pm
So we get sued, lose, pay fees (theirs and ours), and we're back to square one. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 11:50 am
The Supreme Court this morning dismissed Emulex Corp. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 8:36 am
The case, Van Buren v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:58 pm
United States, which seeks review of an interesting takings case out of the U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 12:44 pm
The Court of Appeals' memorandum decision and the Appellate Division's opinion are squarely at odds with a decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Middletown Township v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 3:30 am
Case Name: Blanton v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 3:30 am
Case Name: Blanton v. [read post]
