Search for: "State v Bell" Results 1181 - 1200 of 3,335
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2009, 5:05 am
State: The CCA held that court costs are not punitive and therefore they don't have to be orally pronounced at sentencing to be put in the written judgment in this Bell County burglary case. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Pennsylvania State Supreme CourtWebb v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 3:44 pm
The Court also rejected Fry's argument that AEDPA and the Court's 2003 decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit 2008) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corporation v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am by John Elwood
 (2)  Whether United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
” In a new ruling from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Orton-Bell v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 6:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The causation element requires a showing that the injured party “‘would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence'” (Bells v Foster, 83 AD3d at 877, quoting Kennedy v H. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm
 We thought of this in regard to Clarington v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Siegel, Serena Mayeri & Melissa Murray, Equal Protection in Dobbs and Beyond: How States Protect Life Inside and Outside of the Abortion Context, (43 Columbia Journal of Gender and Law (2023 Forthcoming)).Michael Conklin, Buck v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
No muesli mix-up likely in the world where rabbits reignSupreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) is another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 7 November 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Bell v Department of Work and Pensions QB-2022-001436. [read post]
12 May 2008, 9:47 am
Alabama (1932) established that the Constitution guarantees indigent capital defendants a right to effective appointed counsel, while Norris v. [read post]