Search for: "State v House"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 28,753
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
—Ralph Nader 1Kurach v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am
The decision to nullify the election, as the plaintiffs well knew, had been taken by the House of Bishops. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:51 pm
Calabrese conceded that this intrusion may have been minor, but cited Boyd v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 12:46 pm
Last summer, the US Supreme Court court found in Allen v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am
Former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Tom Bingham, in his book “The Rule of Law”, while explaining the rule of fair trial cited a House of Lords’s case “Regina v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:07 am
Southern States with Jim Crow histories are still relying on moral turpitude laws and the Shelby v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 8:33 am
Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
The bill will proceed to the remaining stages in the House of Commons on 29 November 2023. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 3:46 am
” Part V will respond to recent academic arguments suggesting that the President is an “officer of the United States” for purposes of Section 3. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
The motion stated that the Synod “recognise the progress made by the House of Bishops towards implementing the motion on Living in Love and Faith (LLF) in February 2023 . . . and encourage the House to continue its work of implementation”. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am
The motion stated that the Synod “recognise the progress made by the House of Bishops towards implementing the motion on Living in Love and Faith (LLF) in February 2023 . . . and encourage the House to continue its work of implementation”. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 9:21 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
One month after sending the Fourteenth Amendment to the states, the House of Representatives firmly rejected any constitutional distinction between the phrases “office under” and an “office of” as they were used in various constitutional provisions, including Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, which declares persons holding “offices of the United States” are subject to disqualification from “offices under the United… [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
In Bates v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
The five-page State Department memo was signed by 100 State and U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
The case at issue – Moore v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm
United States, Thomas v. [read post]
