Search for: "State v. Argus "
Results 1181 - 1200
of 85,020
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2015, 9:07 am
Defendants will argue for dismissal, and plaintiffs will argue for remand to a state court that can hear that case. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 8:03 am
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 10:55 pm
At the California Supreme Court on Tuesday, attorneys on both sides will argue about whether California law would allow the Proposition 8 defendants to appeal an unfavorable state court decision if the California governor and attorney general refused to do so. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:24 am
I am pleased to report that the Third Circuit has entered a ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:21 pm
The post State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 11:40 am
Sikkenga v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 1:44 pm
Supreme Court oral argument isn't until Wednesday of this week, when he will argue on behalf of the petitioner in Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 12:25 pm
Walker, and Gertz v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 8:30 am
Morgan v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 5:18 am
Standing was not litigated during the suppression hearing, but, when the evidence was offered in the state's case in chief, the defendant objected again, and state argued the defendant lacked standing and the defendant had no evidence of standing, and the trial court agreed with the state. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:02 am
State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:20 am
That power, we argued, could not be constrained by state law, for precisely the same reason that state law could not constrain state legislatures. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
Biogen IDEC, decided just a month after Merck in the District of Maryland, the district court interpreted Merck's holding in the broadest possible manner, dismissing Classen's claims against Biogen IDEC ("Biogen") and GlaxoSmithKline ("GSK") when the defendants successfully argued that their allegedly infringing acts of research tool use fell within the safe harbor provision of 271(e)(1) as construed in Lilly and Merck. n89footnote 89 states: Classen… [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:19 pm
Research & Mfrs. of Am. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Gatti v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 7:24 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considered arguments in the case of Defense for Children International–Palestine v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 1:39 am
Apple points to a Second Circuit decision (Lotes Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:30 pm
Supreme Court about state sovereign immunity in copyright, Allen v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 8:35 am
While the FCC argues that the MQD is essentially irrelevant after Loper Bright v. [read post]
