Search for: "State v. B. V."
Results 1181 - 1200
of 41,745
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2020, 8:06 am
(Supreme Court of the State of Delaware, May 2, 2019, Leaf Invenergy Company, v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
Justice Gogoi, upholding the principal laid down in William Staney v State of Madhya Pradesh (SC 1956, AIR 116), also took into consideration that the victim did not die on the spot or very shortly after the infliction of injuries but survived for some days in the hospital before death.On a literal interpretation, the judgment seems in consonance with S 300(a) and (b) of the Indian Penal Code. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:32 am
P. 28(b)(6). [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:43 am
Key Insight: Privileged docs based on only state law must be produced in a case with both federal and state claims Nature of Case: Medical malpractice Electronic Data Involved: Responsive documents Keywords: Privilege, state law Identified State Rule(s): K.S.A. section 65-4925(a) Identified Federal Rule(s): FRCP 26(b) [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 1:34 pm
Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:14 pm
Olivas, William B. [read post]
1 May 2013, 2:14 pm
Matthew Kenwrick via flickrIn Moncrieffe v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 11:56 am
§ 1229b(d)(1)(B) provides that once a conviction renders a noncitizen removable, the commission of an underlying offense is deemed to terminate the seven years of continuous residence required to be eligible for cancellation of removal; (ii) the Supreme Court adopted this interpretation in Barton v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 1:14 pm
Serrano v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
By unanimous per curiam decision today, the United States Supreme Court said that where Judge A is present during jury voir dire and Judge B hears a challenge under Batson v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:58 pm
(Evans v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:14 am
§ 874(b). [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 11:19 am
Thompson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 3:04 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:31 pm
The recent case of Wissa v Associated Newspapers Limited ([2014] EWHC 1518 (QB)) is an important reminder that, when pleading a defamation claim, it is necessary to set out the precise text of the words complained of and that it is not sufficient to simply state where they can be found e.g. on a particular URL. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:34 am
P. 54(b) entry of final judgment on plaintiffs' Lanham Act and related state law... [read post]
