Search for: "State v. Brett" Results 1181 - 1200 of 2,110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
Hyatt, in which the court overruled a 40-year-old precedent and held that a state cannot be sued in the courts of another state without its consent. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
The senators who voted to confirm Brett Kavanaugh represented about 44 percent of the country. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Nixon doubled down on the Southern Strategy during the general election, capturing six southern states compared to one for Democrat Hubert Humphrey. [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, an Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) case. [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:57 pm by Amy Howe
The justices denied review in Dahne v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
At CNN, Joan Biskupic explains that “[w]hat happens in [June Medical Services v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:59 am by Adam Feldman
So far this term Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh have all been in the majority in all but one of the court’s 5-4 decisions (In Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 8:18 am by John Floyd
Bush in December 2001, handed down a decision, Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie casts doubt on suggestions by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh during oral argument in Rucho v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Law.com, Marcia Coyle reports that a “committee of the Judicial Conference of the United States has been asked to review orders dismissing misconduct complaints against now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh that stem from his 2017 U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:09 am by Scott Bomboy
The primary constitutional question debated at the Court on Tuesday in Department of Commerce v. [read post]