Search for: "State v. Cornell" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, "allegations consisting of bare legal conclusions as well as factual claims flatly contradicted by documentary evidence are not entitled to any such consideration" (Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, 91 [1999]). [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 11:00 am by Bruce Thomas
 It got a lot of attention, as did Peter’s first shot at a Supreme Court opinion in HTML form, Two Pesos v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment states that “[t]he validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by bndmorris
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
Destefano, No. 07-1428 and 08-328 - Title VII/Whether municipalities may decline to certify results of an exam that would make disproportionately more white applicants eligible for promotion than minority applicants, due to fears that certifying the results would lead to charges of racial discriminationo April 22, 2009 Argument Transcript hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSwiki hereo Cornell Law School/LII herent>o Noted here: Connecticut Employment Law… [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:00 am by Mark Meyer
Wiedmann of Cornell University[1]demonstrated this issue using data from an outbreak in 1997 to 1999. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:47 am by Sarah M Donnelly
 He was a tireless advocate for Indian tribes and Indian peoples, successfully arguing on behalf of the Sac and Fox Nation in the United States Supreme Court in Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:51 am by Walter Olson
In 1987, Federal judge Christine Cook Nettesheim accurately characterized the initial 1973 asbestos case, Borel v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:22 pm
Just this week, a state supreme court ruled against a man who underwent surgery to take out his Medtronic defibrillator because there was a chance the device device's battery could fail. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:22 pm
Just this week, a state supreme court ruled against a man who underwent surgery to take out his Medtronic defibrillator because there was a chance the device device's battery could fail. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:34 am by Dennis Crouch
Duffy was co-counsel in the important Supreme Court case KSR v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 3:53 am by Peter Mahler
In  2017, Cummins stated for the first time to Leonard that he did not consider them to have been partners. [read post]