Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 4,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2019, 6:07 am
I represented plaintiff on appeal. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:17 pm
Today was Day One of the Apple, Foxconn et al. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
NYC Health appealed but the Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the Supreme Court's decision.The Appellate Division opined that Supreme Court had properly deferred to the Board's rational interpretation of the applicable statutes, including the Board's finding that the exemption to public employees' eligibility for collective bargaining set out in the Taylor Law is controlling. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
NYC Health appealed but the Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the Supreme Court's decision.The Appellate Division opined that Supreme Court had properly deferred to the Board's rational interpretation of the applicable statutes, including the Board's finding that the exemption to public employees' eligibility for collective bargaining set out in the Taylor Law is controlling. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
United States (2000), Rehnquist declined to expressly overrule Miranda v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:30 am
Protecting the Interests of Creditors The Appellate Division sorted through competing derivative and direct claims in Tully v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
Given my own views, I would not nominate either to the Supreme Court; nor, I suspect, would they be inclined to nominate someone like me. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
On the same day the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Sharp and Bean LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 3:36 pm
In the case of Gincley v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 12:04 pm
In a March 20, 2019 decision by the New Jersey Appellate Division, State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 12:04 pm
In a March 20, 2019 decision by the New Jersey Appellate Division, State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 12:04 pm
In a March 20, 2019 decision by the New Jersey Appellate Division, State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 7:04 am
A state appeals court upheld that ruling, rejecting the Kleins’ argument that applying the state’s anti-discrimination laws to them violates the First Amendment by compelling them to “express a message—a celebration of same-sex marriage—with which they disagree. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 10:38 pm
One of the only notable valuation rulings I’ve encountered is Vick v Albert, 47 AD2d 482 [1st Dept 2008], a case I previously wrote about here. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
At the time Holmes joined the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, the justices not only heard appeals but sat individually over many trials — they heard all divorce, murder and equity cases as well as a good many probate and civil actions. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
In An NHS Trust v Y [2018] UKSC 46; [2018] 3 WLR 751, a leap-frog appeal from the judgment of O’Farrell J in the Queen’s Bench Division: [2017] EWHC 2866 (QB), 4 WLR 222, the single issue in the appeal was whether a court order must always be obtained before clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (“CANH”), which is keeping a person with a prolonged disorder of consciousness (“PDOC”) alive, can be… [read post]
