Search for: "State v. German"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 3,001
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2013, 2:50 am
The United States Supreme Court clarified this test in Summers v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:50 am
The United States Supreme Court clarified this test in Summers v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm
Ill. 2006) (Italian and German cases sent back to there respective countries), aff’d on somewhat other grounds, 484 F.3d 951 (7th Cir. 2007) (only the Brits appealed); Doe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:28 pm
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 7:47 am
WRB, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 3:02 am
The suspension order stated that "[a]ny submission filed during the pendency of this motion which is not germane thereto will receive no consideration. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:13 pm
On February 8, 2013 the Mannheim Regional Court stayed a German Apple v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:41 am
Hot off the presses and straight from the source, I have an advanced copy of the International Court of Justice preliminary ruling concerning Italy’s counterclaims in the Jurisdiction Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 2:02 am
Robart's legendary Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
Two recent English cases, Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc, indirectly consider Declarations of Non-Infringement in relation to Trade Marks. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 12:51 am
As Matthew Levitt, a partner at Lovells has stated, the Commission will only be further encouraged to pursue zero-tolerance against governmental restrictions, and this will only serve to increase the potential for cross-border mergers.[26] ____________ Endnotes: [1] Case C-112/05, Comm'n v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:37 am
Of the three key decisions that were scheduled for today, the least important one (a Nokia v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
A week ago today, I sat in the gallery of the United States Supreme Court with twenty North Carolina district court judges listening to Chief Justice John Roberts announce the court’s opinion in Endrow v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:41 pm
And should a German CTM court be obliged to restrain non-similar use in Germany because the mark are similar to a Spanish speaker? [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
I plan to attend the appellate hearing, which I guess will take place in a couple of months.UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION OF THE KEY PASSAGES OF THE DECISION (with my explanations in [brackets]):In NetDoktor.de v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm
Abel v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:02 am
The case is Oracle v UsedSoft, in which Europe's top court is being invited to rule on whether downloaded software may be traded as "used". [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:17 pm
Before getting to the substance of this post, I want to join Vikram and V. [read post]
