Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 1181 - 1200 of 8,246
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am by Rui Dias
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 8:46 am by John Jascob
" Accordingly, the court reversed the division’s civil sanction against the appellant and remanded the matter for a determination of attorney fees (Ahmasuk v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:37 pm by Shannon O'Hare
Nonetheless, as Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, stated, “the good news is, Congress is not going to be the Grinch”. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am by David Super
  That settlement was achieved through popular constitutionalism rather than Article V, leaving the election challengers two diametrically opposite choices. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
In 2010, the Uniform Collaborative Law Act (“UCLA”) was made available to state legislatures, effectively ending the debate. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 8:00 am by Daniel Nathan
An investment contract was defined by the Supreme Court in SEC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 11:20 am by Eric Goldman
Oct. 21, 2020): “because the infringing act of downloading the material occurred on a computer outside the United States, there was no act in the United States to establish jurisdiction” * Donat v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:26 pm by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Fostoria Ohio, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 1:42 pm by Sonia Gill
Holder by effectively putting a stop to the preclearance process. [read post]