Search for: "State v. I. A. A." Results 1181 - 1200 of 84,580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2013, 12:05 pm
The Case The Supreme Court of the United States recently overturned the Defense of Marriage Act when it found the act to be unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 1:27 pm
[including this statement] I write separately to further comment on the application of the T.L.O. test announced in Myers v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  A special thanks to Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Zaven V. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Rev.709 (1994).And indeed In League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:56 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) In an earlier post, I looked at the Petitioner’s arguments made in the merits brief filed in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:31 pm
Though, to be honest, I'd rather have Cythia Albritton perform this task than the State of California.But barely. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 7:34 am by Derek Muller
I filed this amicus brief in support of the respondents in Moore v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:46 pm
Frankly, I think the guards that stopped him have a better claim against him.Elsewhere:Suit: You kept me frm jumping off the Empire State Building (Overlawyered)Would-Be Jumper Sues Empire State Building (NYT- City Room)Stuntman Could Face Indictment Anew (Associated Press)Ridiculous Lawsuit of the Month (CKA Mediation and Arbitration) [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:21 pm by WIMS
The rule finalizes EPA's finding that the trading programs in the Transport Rule, also known as the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR), achieve greater reasonable progress towards the national goal of achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas than source-specific Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) in those states covered by the Transport Rule [See WIMS 6/7/12]. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:36 am
National Geographic Society I, 244 F.3d 1267, on the basis of intervening law in the Supreme Court Tasini decision, 533 U.S. 233. [read post]