Search for: "State v. Jacobs" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1535Issue: (1) Whether prosecutors are permitted to withhold materials covered by Brady v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Columbus attorney Teri Rasmussen of Plunkett Cooney in her Ohio Practical Business Law Blog Classic Cases - Castano v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
In a case of “turnabout is fair play,” last Friday, a United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut considered, and disregarded, the USPTO’s reexamination analysis of the same prior art in Jacobs Vehicle Equipment Co. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Lisa Soronen offers “A Tribute to Justice Ginsburg from a State and Local Government Perspective” for the National League of Cities. [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Federal Judge Strikes Down Pennsylvania Same-Sex Marriage Ban – Harrisburg lawyer Lee Tankle of McNees Wallace & Nurick on the firm’s Pennsylvania Labor & Employment Blog Oklahoma Joins the Patent Troll Hunt – Jacob Martinez and Tod Melgar of Chadbourne & Parke on the firm’s blog, TMT Perspectives Cybersecurity Securities Class Actions are Coming: Predictions, Analysis, and Practical Guidance – Seattle attorney Douglas Greene of Lane Powell on the… [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
 In case you were wondering, they were Margot Fröhlinger, Director, DG Internal Market and Services, European Commission, Brussels Dr Klaus Grabinski, Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) Karlsruhe Professor Sir Robin Jacob, University College London  Marcin Korolec, Undersecretary of State, Ministry of Economy, Warsaw Eurico Marques dos Reis, Judge of the Court of Appeal, Lisbon Kevin Mooney, Partner and Head of Intellectual Property, Simmons & Simmons,… [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:35 am by Edith Roberts
Barr (involving immigration) and Ramos v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
 The IPKat's resident expert in the affairs of the higher echelons of the British judiciary informs him that litigation in the UK in the honest concurrent use dispute of Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnick v  Anheuser-Busch Inc (noted by the IPKat here) is not going any further. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 2:47 am
As stated above, section 80 of the Patents Act does not make any reference to the court. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
” By contrast, the Caucasian panelist stated that his son had been arrested several times because his son had a drug problem that had been going on for years. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:18 pm by Christiana Wayne
The Supreme Court upheld Arizona voting restrictions in Brnovich v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 1:39 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Yang Liu and Brandon Vines discussed the impact of Louisiana v. [read post]