Search for: "State v. M. T." Results 1181 - 1200 of 16,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Rachel Bercovitz, Todd Carney
Circuit had outlined these “demanding standards” in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:46 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 8:37 am by Eugene Volokh
When I criticize someone in public (someone over whom I have no legal authority), I'm not wielding state power; I'm just speaking. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am by Orin Kerr
  But this isn’t a major change in the law. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:14 pm
A former linguistics professor at Cal State Fullerton who the university attempted to fire and her spouse. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:58 pm
Originally called Sun Microsystems Inc v M-Tech Data Ltd and another (noted by the IPKat here), the case of Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein was marked out by the IPKat as a thunderously bad decision when the Court of Appeal reversed the decision of Kitchin J at [2010] EWCA Civ 997. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Worse, they have made an interest-free loan of $2,500 to the applicable federal or state government. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Similarly, in the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 7:05 am by Eric Goldman
I’m baffled that this panel never cited the 7th Circuit’s prior and binding Armslist precedent, Vesely v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:10 pm
I'm somewhat of two minds about this morning's decision from the California Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 5:39 am by Ryan
Bysiewicz wants this resolved prior to the state convention in May. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 2:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
But that's because I'm asserting my own rights as a citizen to access court records, so I'm representing myself pro se. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  I’m not sure how they figured the result in State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:31 am
JOSEFFER (ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING THE PETITIONER): The United States view — I’m not sure exactly how much we disagree on this — but the United States view is that, for example, a blank disk is not a component of this invention because you don’t need a blank disk to practice this invention. [read post]