Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 1181 - 1200 of 19,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 9:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Justice Moore-Brick stated he found it unlikely that the grant would not have intended to extend to the low water mark on those occasions where the water falls below the mean law-water mark. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
The Board dismissed an opposition to registration of the mark SAVEMAX REALTY in the logo form shown below, finding it not likely to cause confusion with the famous mark RE/MAX, both for real estate brokerage services RE/MAX International Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:02 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 The Illinois Supreme Court will resolve the issue in Hartney Fuel Oil Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:46 pm by Lara
Related Posts: Burning Man’s Burning Marks Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises Frustrated Trademark Attorney Examines Frustrated Marks Geekview IP Week in Review Disney Withdraws its Trademark Registration Applications for SEAL TEAM 6 [read post]