Search for: "State v. Master" Results 1181 - 1200 of 3,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2016, 1:41 am by INFORRM
  In doing so, he referred to the leading authority Proctor v Bailey(1889) 42 Ch 390, which states that “… an injunction is granted for prevention, and where there is no ground for apprehending the repetition of a wrongful act there is no ground for an injunction“. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 7:35 am by Joy Waltemath
She sued under a state tort law theory, which does not provide a cause of action—that’s what the state’s employment discrimination statute is for. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 7:27 am by John Jascob
In so holding, the panel adopted a rule established in the Section 10(b) case of Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  First, he passes along a new medical device preemption decision, Bishoff v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Under the master leasing program, Cay Clubs would rent out the units, with 65% going to the unit owner. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 9 to 11 October 2018 the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Bean and Flaux LJJ) heard the defendant’s appeal in the data protection case of Various Claimants v W M Morrison Supermarkets. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:50 am by Staci Zaretsky
”Judge Gerald Lebovits of the New York City Criminal Court has written previously on the subject of proper usage in the New York State Bar Association Journal, noting that, “[k]nowing the difference between ‘that’ and ‘which’ separates the master from the apprentice. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
They also found dark clothing lying on the ground outside of the master bedroom closet. [read post]
5 May 2007, 2:25 pm
The case concerned the exportation of machine-readable “golden masters” by Microsoft outside the United States for copying and installation onto computers. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 2:47 pm
"As the court pointed out, whether the directors count as "employees"is governed by the United States Supreme Court's analysis in ClackamasGastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]