Search for: "State v. Oxford" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,744
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2013, 5:00 am by Beth Graham
  In her article, Professor Mullenix examines the upcoming United States Supreme Court decision in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 1:22 pm by Sarah Cole
Oxford Health Plans (more on that later), I am pleased to announce that Ohio State’s 2013 Schwartz Lecture will be given by Professor Christopher Drahozal, from University of Kansas, on Thursday at noon in Saxbe Auditorium. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 9:46 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Supreme Court heard argument this morning in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
The book looks at such pivotal cases as the 1922 Supreme Court case which held that federal antitrust laws did not apply to baseball; the 1972 Flood v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
Former Pentagon General Counsel Jeh Johnson is, at this hour, giving this speech at Fordham Law School in New York: Keynote address at the Center on National Security at Fordham Law School:  A “Drone Court”: Some Pros and Cons by Jeh Charles Johnson[1] March 18, 2013 [preliminary extemporaneous remarks] Thank you for this invitation. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:38 am by Ronald Collins
Hockett, A Storm over This Court: Law, Politics, and Supreme Court Decision Making in Brown v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 1:35 am
Jure Vidmar (Univ. of Oxford - Law) has posted Rethinking Jus Cogens after Germany v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 10:46 am by royblack
” Words of wisdom from Justice Hugo Black as codified in Gideon v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
Today, the Second Chamber of the General Court handed over two interesting judgments (cases T-426/11 and T-412/11, Maharishi Foundation Ltd. v OHIM), which provide useful guidance on the evaluation of the descriptive character of a sign, as well as on the notion of relevant public, in relation to a word sign whose meaning can be easily understood by consumers residing in different member states, due to its closeness to equivalent expressions in other national languages. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Next month, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am by Victoria VanBuren
Saionton was previously the law clerk to the Chief Justice of India, V N Khare. [read post]