Search for: "State v. Plain" Results 1181 - 1200 of 11,817
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2006, 11:06 am
  This is a dangerous step in the jurisprudence of this state. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:05 am by Jon Sands
It could be decided under plain error, and not finding an overruling, and that is the basis of the concurrence.U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:21 am by Charles Sartain
It depends on context, says the Supreme Court of Texas in Finley Resources Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 4:11 am
This post is not a summary of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jindal Stainless Ltd v State of Haryana, Civil Appeal No. 3453/2002 (2016) (“the Entry Tax case”). [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 3:18 pm
This post is not a summary of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jindal Stainless Ltd v State of Haryana, Civil Appeal No. 3453/2002 (2016) (“the Entry Tax case”). [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 10:48 am
At Monday's oral argument in Nijhawan v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 10:55 am by Lisa Baird
Whether Judge Ronnie Abrams will follow suit, of course, remains to be seen, but Pacira has Second Circuit precedent—United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 5:57 am by John Jascob
After tracing the history of Regulation A from its original adoption in 1936, the appellate panel turned to the states’ contention that the SEC’s definition of “qualified purchaser” contravenes the plain meaning of the Securities Act. [read post]