Search for: "State v. Plain" Results 1181 - 1200 of 11,763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2013, 8:54 am by Bryan Heaney
That would be an unwarranted gloss on the plain statutory language. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 5:57 am by John Jascob
After tracing the history of Regulation A from its original adoption in 1936, the appellate panel turned to the states’ contention that the SEC’s definition of “qualified purchaser” contravenes the plain meaning of the Securities Act. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am by Ben Henriques, Corker Binning
In brief, the case of R v Egan [1992] 4 All ER 470 had stated (without the court having heard full argument) that the previous case of R v Lloyd [1967] 1 QB 175 legitimised two approaches to defining ‘substantial’ in the context of diminished responsibility. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:40 am by Kiera Flynn
This week a Michigan state court relied on this Term’s decision in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:57 am by Calvin Massey
  But in any case it is an inapt analogy to the issue presented in King v. [read post]