Search for: "State v. Wisdom"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 2,319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:03 am
David Stone recently shared his wisdom on the current and anticipated EU designs law changes with IPSoc members. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
One topical example: the leaked draft Supreme Court opinionpurporting to overrule Roe v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 3:42 am
The appellate court decided to engage in its own analysis, and cited the 11th’s District’s 1997 decision in State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 3:31 pm
Today, in Lopez-Soto v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 4:28 pm
People v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:33 am
In Larson v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:30 am
In today’s editorial, “Show Me Your Insiders,” Collins’s first point is that Missourians are “crazy about insiders,” despite the conventional wisdom that voters hate incumbents and career politicians. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
The North Carolina Court of Appeals looked at contract analysis in Brian Kent Brown v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:08 pm
Housing Partners I, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:21 pm
[The decision the court is referring to is Walsh v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
Hearstand Yakus v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm
Hill, Jr. v. [read post]
The Free Speech Trifecta: How the Court Could Fundamentally Alter Free Speech in Three Pending Cases
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In Murthy v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:41 am
The Trunki caseThe key cases relevant to these questions were Proctor & Gamble v Reckitt Benckiser [2007] EWCA Civ 936, in which it was held that a registered design based on a line drawing was for the shape alone, and Samsung v Apple [2012] EWCA Civ 1339, in which Apple had contended that lack of ornamentation was a feature of the simple line drawing of a tablet which they had registered as the design. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
In the case of K.U. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:22 pm
I have pushed back on that conventional wisdom, as you noted [in my original post]. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
United States. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:41 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:33 pm
This Court has recognized that Section 5′s intrusion on state sovereignty raises serious constitutional questions” (citing the 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
