Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Harris"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 2,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2019, 1:27 pm
Bostock v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 2:52 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:25 am
Admiral Harry Harris’s assertion last week that the United States would “clearly defend [the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands] if they are attacked by China. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
The judge said that it was “of regret when people in public office comment about a person who is involved in a trial which is in progress”. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:41 am
Harris v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:11 am
This May, the Supreme Court in Graham v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:42 am
Either way, you can bet on the Court’s eventual decision being both contentious and momentous; these are the kinds of cases that people will be studying a century from now, taking their place with Dred Scott, Plessy v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 3:42 pm
Batson v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:28 am
And of course, the Supreme Court has repeatedly reaffirmed this, for instance in Harris v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 2:40 pm
Full text available online at http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/15/1/08-0299_article.htm Harris, JP, et al. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
The ‘684 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Harris Corporation v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
The ‘684 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Harris Corporation v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 10:15 am
From People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:31 am
Harris Cty. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 1:02 am
Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer, Frank Lautenberg, and Mark Udall. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 9:34 pm
For background on this dispute, check out my earlier posts: "Danone v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
In Ring v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 10:14 am
Hamilton was correct, but the constitutional scholar could not have foreseen, in his wildest imagination, the Court’s decision-making in Bush v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:00 pm
In 2008, a divided Supreme Court, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
The chief justice announces that Sotomayor has the opinion today in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
