Search for: "UNKNOWN PERSONS AND INTERESTED PARTIES" Results 1181 - 1200 of 1,819
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2014, 12:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Res judicata or claim preclusion is invoked to prevent a party, or one in privity with a party, from relitigating a previously litigated action. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
And Carrie Cordero breathed a sigh of relief that third party metadata storage is now off the table while outlining some of the challenges and unknowns that need to be answered as the metadata reform proposals continue to advance John had a bit of a back and forth this week with Ryan Goodman at Just Security: John published a rejoinder to Goodman’s criticism of his PCLOB testimony that argued that, even if applied extraterritorially,  the ICCPR wouldn’t… [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:37 pm by Larry
That should protect Nortel's interests, if it continues to have any. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:42 am
 Another interesting question was why OHIM restricts its mediation to the Board of Appeal level (this is in contrast to the UKIPO). [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by Carrie Cordero
So it is worth identifying some of the unknowns that will need to be addressed and resolved as the discussion and debate continues. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
In many cases the third party (often an ISP) does not defend and so there is no one looking at the interests of the alleged defendants who may in fact be innocent of the alleged infringement, for example, as the account holder of an IP address may not in fact be the infringer or the taking may not in some cases be infringement. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 5:16 am by Marty Lederman
”  Therefore “the relevant legal question ought not to be whether a foetus is 'alive' or 'a person' from the moment of conception, or the moment of viability, etc., as if the question were one of natural rather than social decision. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 3:38 pm by Cicely Wilson
The complaint alleged that during a “surprise raid” Bray was required to sit on his couch while flak-jacketed Marshals, advocates for political positions that Bray despised, plus unknown persons, seized the books, papers, computers and cameras, of Bray and his family, excepting only children’s books and Bibles. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 12:48 pm by Michael Walsh
It is interesting to note that Manosa’s parents were unaware that she was throwing this party. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 6:07 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
   Interested persons are invited to hear a briefing on a series of new developments including this latest Resolution Agreement at the March 18, 2014 North Texas Healthcare Professionals Association Meeting. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 2:05 pm by SJM
In one sense, the possession claim in Manchester Ship Canal Developments v Persons Unknown [2014] EWHC  645  (Ch) follows a fairly predictable course. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 2:05 pm by SJM
In one sense, the possession claim in Manchester Ship Canal Developments v Persons Unknown [2014] EWHC  645  (Ch) follows a fairly predictable course. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
If, in fact, the CIA legitimately believed that a classified internal document had come to be in the possession of any outside person (even including the Committee) by unknown means, that fact could constitute a legitimate basis to conduct a security inquiry or related criminal investigation. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
The case had attracted significant interest domestically and internationally, with the claimant supported by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, and the Secretary of State for Transport intervening on his behalf. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:29 am by Ana
  Whether this was a deliberate decision motivated by a concern for preserving the proprietary rights of common law couples or a more practical interest in judicial economy is unknown. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Police officers may accordingly approach a person against whom they harbor no suspicion at all, on an occasion on which they have no state interest in mind that they hope to advance in any way, and they may nonetheless conduct a lawful search of a person who responds “yes” to the question, “Is it okay if we search your [house, car, suitcase, etc.]? [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:38 pm by Jonathan Bailey
The person doing the fixing is the filmmaker and they, typically, are considered the copyright holder. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:41 am by Lyle Denniston
  Other parties may file briefs on the same point, according to the order; those will be due by Friday, March 7. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 2:52 pm by Florian Mueller
Two -- and this was no less important to me personally --, I know that HTC and its lawyers found themselves in disagreement with my commentary more frequently than Nokia did, but I do respect both companies (over the years I've taken increasingly favorable positions on HTC's approach to patent litigation) and appreciated this opportunity to show it.Now that the dust has settled and a deal has been struck, I sincerely hope that the deal terms (which are entirely unknown to me) will… [read post]