Search for: "United States Solicitor General"
Results 1181 - 1200
of 4,870
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2010, 4:03 pm
Waxman, a former United States solicitor general who has argued more than 50 cases in the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:01 am
Herbert Hoover, who had appointed Hughes’s son as Solicitor General in 1929, appointed Hughes Chief Justice of the United States on February 3, 1930. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 7:43 am
While many attorneys contributed to this brief, former Solicitor General of the United States Paul D. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 9:30 pm
United States v Windsor challenges the denial of federal benefits for gay couples under the Defense of Marriage Act [DOMA].As many as 17 states have filed amicus briefs in opposition to gay marriage. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:05 pm
The Solicitor General of the United States, Elizabeth B. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 1:23 am
Instead, back in January, it invited the SG to express the views of the United States on whether it should hear the case. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:42 pm
Also in attendance for the State were Hawaii’s First Deputy Solicitor General Kimberly Tsumoto Guidry and Solicitor General Girard D. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:30 pm
In late May 2008, the United States - in response to the Court's late January call for the views of the Solicitor General - filed a brief in which it urges the Court to grant certiorari. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 3:04 pm
Ciara Dinneny is JURIST’s European Bureau Chief and a trainee solicitor with the Law Society of Ireland. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 5:55 am
United States, 463 U.S. 110 (1983). [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
Solicitor General Donald B. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:33 am
On June 24 of this year, the Court asked the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
It is very likely because the Solicitor General has agreed cert should be granted. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 10:43 am
United States; see my preview), the question presented in the second case (United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Their First Amendment right to spend as much money as they want in the Republican primaries and the subsequent general election (without coordination with the candidates’ campaigns) rests on other campaign finance rulings, not on Citizens United. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
United States, No. 11-1395, which is pending a response from the Solicitor General (due September 12), and Stanley v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:43 pm
The policy at the heart of United States v. [read post]
